Now, I may support Senator Clinton, but at least you know my biases, having said that, I'm one of the most objective Clinton supporters you are likely to meet. Senator Obama is now accusing Clinton of running the first attack ad of the campaign season. While the ad does mention Obama, the ad is factually correct and displays specifics. Clinton was for a foreclosure moratorium (I support this), Obama was not. Clinton is for a gas tax holiday (I do not support this), Obama is not. This is simply stating a factual difference. If that is an attack ad, then I cannot imagine what I would see in the fall. Is the ad tough? Yes. Is it an attack ad? No. Can it be viewed that way? Obama thinks so.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Is This an Attack Ad?
Posted by
Rick Evans
at
4:05 PM
Now, I may support Senator Clinton, but at least you know my biases, having said that, I'm one of the most objective Clinton supporters you are likely to meet. Senator Obama is now accusing Clinton of running the first attack ad of the campaign season. While the ad does mention Obama, the ad is factually correct and displays specifics. Clinton was for a foreclosure moratorium (I support this), Obama was not. Clinton is for a gas tax holiday (I do not support this), Obama is not. This is simply stating a factual difference. If that is an attack ad, then I cannot imagine what I would see in the fall. Is the ad tough? Yes. Is it an attack ad? No. Can it be viewed that way? Obama thinks so.
Tag: Barack Obama, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Video
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search
Categories
- Al Gore (24)
- Alan Keyes (1)
- Alcee Hastings (1)
- Barack Obama (342)
- Basra (1)
- Ben Nelson (1)
- Bill Richardson (128)
- Christopher Dodd (35)
- Chuck Hagel (11)
- Congress (27)
- Convention (8)
- David Patraeus (1)
- Delegates (18)
- Democrats (568)
- Dennis Kucinich (45)
- Don Cazayoux (1)
- Duncan Hunter (24)
- election (3)
- Endorsement (1)
- Evan Bayh (6)
- Exit Polls (1)
- FEC (1)
- Florida (1)
- Foreign Policy (2)
- Fred Thompson (130)
- General (40)
- George W. Bush (5)
- Governorship (1)
- Harry Reid (1)
- Health Care (3)
- Hillary Clinton (379)
- Ike Skelton (1)
- Independent (12)
- Indiana (4)
- Iran (1)
- Iraq (26)
- Jeremiah Wright (1)
- Jim Gilmore (5)
- Joe Biden (83)
- John Edwards (223)
- John McCain (298)
- Kentucky (1)
- Louisiana (1)
- Mark Warner (2)
- Michael Bloomberg (7)
- Mike Gravel (10)
- Mike Huckabee (164)
- Mitch McConnell (1)
- Mitt Romney (265)
- Nancy Pelosi (2)
- Nasiriya (1)
- Newt Gingrich (55)
- North Carolina (7)
- Ohio (1)
- Other Democrats (13)
- Other Republicans (25)
- Pennsylvania (11)
- Poll (179)
- Primaries (13)
- Primary (5)
- Ralph Nader (1)
- Rankings (4)
- Ray Odierno (1)
- Republican (519)
- Republicans (8)
- Rhode Island (1)
- Ron Paul (90)
- Rudy Giuliani (241)
- Russia (1)
- Sam Brownback (45)
- Shia cult (1)
- speeches (1)
- Steven Colbert (1)
- Superdelegates (5)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Terrorism (2)
- Texas (1)
- Tom Tancredo (23)
- Tom Vilsack (16)
- Tommy Thompson (18)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Veepstakes (9)
- Venezuela (1)
- Vermont (1)
- Video (30)
- Vladimir Putin (1)
- Wesley Clark (9)
- Wisconsin (1)
- Woody Jenkins (1)
- WWE (1)
-
Recent Comments
- Yeah. Most of the "attack" ads we've seen have be... - May 4, 2008 - noreply@blogger.com (Political Realm)
- As a Obama supporter I'd to say I agree with you, ... - May 1, 2008 - noreply@blogger.com (Robert)
- I don't care what delegates have endoresed in the ... - Apr 30, 2008 - noreply@blogger.com (Anonymous)
- While most of the media will pay more attention to... - Apr 25, 2008 - noreply@blogger.com (Political Realm)
- "Conditional support for nuking Iran?" Please, quo... - Apr 22, 2008 - noreply@blogger.com (Rick Evans)





2 comments:
As a Obama supporter I'd to say I agree with you, it's not an attack ad.
Yeah. Most of the "attack" ads we've seen have been extremely tame by historical standards. Clinton's run several ads that were more "attacky" than this one.
Post a Comment